![]() In addition Webroot has a major advantage of a huge database of malicious url's - which is one of the most common ways that malware is being spread nowadays - through links in email. Webroot outperforms all of them for performance and a major advantage of Webroot over Eset is Webroot is cloud based central management - no on premise install. Eset ranked extremely well on just about every test you could imagine. Eset were rated highly on performance, malware protection etc. This was looking at a number of websites. So they no longer meet the requirements of a network and server system.īitdefender and Crowdstrike I have ruled out as Eset consistently outperformed pretty much every product out there on pretty much all tests. They don't officially support servers any more and don't have a central management system for their new Avira Product. I have ruled out the followingīitdefender, Avira and Crowdstrike leaving me with Eset and Webroot.Īvira was a fantastic product but it seems that they have moved out of the small business network market to focus more on the consumer market. After all, it does not hurt to ask for additional things.Īnyways, I last updated it about a year ago, so it is still fairly current. For example, just because you are already getting a standard educational discount does not mean you can ask a little bit of a larger one, or perhaps throw in something like a free/discounted home-use clause for students, free management server (if that's an add-on), certification vouchers and the like. It goes over the basics of evaluating security software, which it sounds like you already may have a handle on, but there might be a few other things in there of value. While I do not have a specific recommendation for any of the products on your short-list, I would like to point out one of the Spiceworks Community How-To's I have been periodically revising. That said, I would note that in addition to email, web browsers have traditionally been a major source of infection and in a school environment that is likely to be a concern as well, as students will be… students. It sounds like you have already done some winnowing of products available to you, as well as have an idea what you want to protect, and what you see the greatest threat vectors as being. Price - as the clients are schools, so price will very much be a factor here. ![]() Does not affect common programs like Firefox, Microsoft Word etc.The idea is to get a third, different AV product to pick up anything that they might have missed. Sentinel One I have ruled out as support is apparently awful and there have been issues with the product hosing VM's and causing issues with programs not starting etc.Ĭyren and Clamav are in use by our Mail server. Last but not least, malware writers will most likely spend most of their efforts bypassing Windows Defender as the most likely AV being used on a Windows system. Lack of central management (we don't use SSCM or Intune) and because the general feeling is that Windows Defender is good, but not as good as other solutions. I have ruled out Windows Defender for three reasons. I have ruled out Kaspersky, Sophos and Trend Micro because they are resource heavy - which for me is a big no no. I have ruled out Norton, Mcafee and Avast as I have no confidence in them from a security point of view. Norton, Avast, Mcafee, Sophos, Kaspersky, Sentinel One, What I am looking for is to address specific shortcomings in our current Anti Virus Solution and see what other people recommend.īitdefender, Avira, Eset, Crowdstrike and Webroot (for renewal) I don't want this to become a post about which Anti Virus product is better as it's very clear that there is no way to objectively answer that question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |